Ooohhhhh Yes it is I who is saying, and this will be missed more than one, but it can not be more!.
and I moved from being a faithful follower of the ideas of Richard Stallman to be an active user (and critical) software "Open Source" (and I said Open Source free software because the freedom it professes The FSF does not exist, unless BSD License, MIT, X11, Apache or similar) I have through various state, including being a passive user of free software and mix working hours between Linux and Windows, but long ago I do not install Windows on my hard drive and have gone as far as not knowing how to solve trivial problems in XP, debian user I am a long time, but work has forced me distros myself to where the problems are "resolved " because time is short and customers do not forgive, so I moved to Ubutu and migrate the servers installed Ubuntu Server, but in the constant search for the tool that meets my needs (and especially the customers) I am inclined to use openSUSE (and as it was almost sacrilegious to me, since I did it in silence) I read many guides and I tested in many environments as I could, only to discover openSUSE is the best desktop Linux distribution that had never used, polished interface and a complete delight to work, very few packages that are not in openSUSE and those who do not have no problem finding them in pbone , anyway, just needed to prove in the server and download trial versions and tried vmware images using all possible functions, only to run into performance is excellent and good quality any Linux distribution should look like SUSE.
The thing is, that people from Novell was given by making deals with the devil or if it's like they want to see some members "respectable" community to refer to the Novell and Microsoft deal that has not echo anything other than bring benefits (financial at least) for novell but aroused the envy and annoyance of others, in short, if there is controversy there is no problem, that's good for all at the same time instructive. What really bothers me is the behavior of many who do not want to accept that one of the companies that are most echo the development of free software is just novell, which include: sponsoring the development of monkey, evolution, based on the development f-spot, tomboy and beagle, which today are the flagship of the development of Linux on the desktop, and as mentioned no xgl and compiz, yes sir, full and complete development of Novell, ductal whom it hurts, yes, that is beryl, but for those who do not know, beryl is nothing if Novell had not developed as compiz beryl is a fork that was formed because development of "community" were not ubuntu considered for incorporation into compiz (not want to go about performance or anything, just mention who gave the dough to make all this a reality).
And now the FSF has the stupid idea of \u200b\u200bPREVENTING SELL NOVELL LINUX by dumbing down the levels are still low the only thing is an idea, but you can not allow the FSF to continue curtailing freedoms and selling false ideas, with each licensing model increasingly prohibitive (read the draft GPLv3) Well, nobody forces us to change the licensing model to GPLv3, but there are many blind followers.
The thing is simple and say so wild as it occurs to me: The FSF is an organization that while great progress has echo deliver software "Free" to the community, now follows the same pattern of FUD that some private companies, infusing lies and confusion, this case is like the stock market, when a developer is about to choose a distro for which your software will run at 100% and bumps that Novell may prohibit the distribution of Linux, Novell will not be an option to be taken into account. and all this because the FSF seems to be being driven by paranoid instincts and Misperceptions about what is true freedom, the freedom to choose to do or not do anything, the freedom to sell or not. That if what was mine and develop my time, but I base a few lines of a guy who came up to release their work under GPL, pos am "BOUND" and lease it "forced" to follow license as if my work hours were not worth a damn, and if my decision was to change everything to something that delivers freedom as the MIT license, just after I can not. That is not freedom.! and I do not trust any movement or decision of the FSF, I have deaf ears against such brutality, the FSF is all crap to me.
0 comments:
Post a Comment