Well, I will save the chatter, the creativecommons is an interesting (and intelligent solution) to the problem of post licensing under X, Y or Z contents, but one has to do each thing, eg this article (and many others but not worth making a list, neither want to take on linuxparatodos that are helpful to the community and simply made it clear that I put the article as an example because my news reader upgrade and I happened to read, I mean, is the article I had in front) who is licensed creativecommons 2.1 which prevents the reproduction of the writing there for commercial purposes but it turns out in this article do not find anything, but absolutely nothing new, nothing that you are not seeing the first time you took a book of * nix in your hands, and criticism is:
Damn, that gives us right limit the use or disclosure of information with commercial purposes, when we publish is not a new science or anything, but it is just a summary of public absolutely know that repeat in a thousand ways in various howtos and in my opinion (then do not say stupid things) can be used as we Plasco.
In short: More careful what you write and attributes that we take to license.
0 comments:
Post a Comment